40th Terrace & Sunset To Get Water and Roads; Petitioners get Relief


April 6, 2014

NOTE: Video of this meeting has been provided by Steve Tarr. Click HERE.

Most of ‘the action’ in the fairly long City Council Meeting on April 3rd took place at the beginning and end of the meeting.  Since most in the audience left by the end – we’ll start there.

Sunset Drive and 40th Terrace:  Anyone following city issues for a long time knows that this area of the city, annexed in 2002, has had complicated issues with water, roads and sewers.  Both the City and the County have to be involved with the resolution.  Significant progress was made Thursday via Resolution 26, 2014 – with the Council deciding to go with option 3 – providing ‘city’ water (via Seacoast utility) and taking ownership of the roads with the affected residents to pay via the Neighborhood Improvement Assessment Program (NIAP).  Option 3 will take 4-6 months before it can be started and in the interim both the County and the City will look for funding to provide additional relief for the property owners who must pay the assessment.   The plan will not include a sewer hookup.

Citizen Initiated Referendum:  Currently it takes petitions signed by 15% of registered Palm Beach Gardens voters in the last general election in order to place a citizen-initiated referendum on the ballot.  Florida Statutes only require 10%.  Last month, the group circulating petitions to place term limits on the ballot ( “Palm Beach Gardens Needs Term Limits” ) filed a lawsuit challenging the 15% requirement and the Council requested that the ordinance be revised to change the number required to 10%.  The Council passed the first reading of the Ordinance unanimously.

Charter Review:  Council member  Russo asked that there be discussion on having a Charter Review committee – there was much debate on how such a committee should be named, how it should be moderated and when proposed changes should be on the ballot.   While discussion will continue, the Council generally liked the idea of having an ‘impartial’ professional moderator, qualified (and ‘apolitical’) committee members and aiming for November, 2016.  Trust was an issue and there was general agreement that the changes were not being proposed by the Council.   Several on the Council did seem preoccupied with the concept of Term Limits as it came up several times during the discussion of charter changes.  Council member Tinsley said that she supports term limits but ‘reasonable’ term limits and what is out there isn’t reasonable.  Council member Jablin echoed her sentiments as did others.  Watch for further actions on this topic!

Videotaping of Council Meetings:   While this topic has come up several times in the past, several months ago resident Steve Tarr requested that City Council Meetings be televised.  City Manager Ferris was directed to come back with options and costs but no decisions were made.  In the meanwhile, Mr. Tarr has been taping the meetings and posting them on youtube, and we have posted them on PBGWatch.  The Council discussed the topic once again and asked Mr. Ferris to implement Video on Demand – a day after posting of the Council Meetings.  That would be a first step and the city would be able to see how many people actually view the video prior to taking the more extensive and more expensive step of live video.

Back to the beginning of the Council Meeting….

All other resolutions resolutions and the Consent Agenda passed unanimously.

Also – learn about Avenir proposals in the workshop scheduled by the developer on Monday, April 7th.  The council has mentioned more than once that they are opposed to the current proposals.

Thanks again to Steve Tarr for recording the meetings.