Rachelle Litt wins the Group 5 Runoff
Congratulations to the winner in the Group 5 runoff election, Rachelle Litt, who won the race by 16 points, 58% to 42% over challenger Joe Russo.
The newcomers, including Ms. Litt, Dr. Mark Marciano and Matthew Lane, will be sworn in at the next Council meeting on April 6. The Mayor and other Council officers will be selected at that time.
Turnout for the race was 5235 – 13% of registered voters, and 83% of the turnout on 3/14. As runoffs go this was respectable as in the last March runoff in 2004, only 59% of the original voters returned to cast their ballot.
Group 5 Runoff | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Strong Litt | Weak Litt | Very Close | Weak Russo | Strong Russo> |
Click the precinct on the map for vote totals. |
1186 | 1426 | 196 | 14 | 132 | 64 | 67.3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1188 | 869 | 65 | 7 | 39 | 26 | 60.0 |
1189 | 75 | 17 | 23 | 0 | 17 | 0.0 |
1190 | 3166 | 248 | 8 | 112 | 136 | 45.2 |
1192 | 1476 | 160 | 11 | 94 | 66 | 58.8 |
1194 | 2023 | 390 | 19 | 264 | 126 | 67.7 |
1238 | 1667 | 288 | 17 | 195 | 93 | 67.7 |
1240 | 2479 | 341 | 14 | 231 | 110 | 67.7 |
1242 | 2490 | 459 | 18 | 290 | 168 | 63.3 |
1244 | 1544 | 200 | 13 | 118 | 82 | 59.0 |
1246 | 2380 | 282 | 12 | 168 | 112 | 60.0 |
1247 | 221 | 50 | 23 | 6 | 44 | 12.0 |
1248 | 1488 | 226 | 15 | 133 | 93 | 58.8 |
1250 | 61 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 100.0 |
1252 | 2355 | 797 | 34 | 356 | 441 | 44.7 |
1254 | 454 | 63 | 14 | 48 | 15 | 76.2 |
1260 | 1320 | 164 | 12 | 107 | 57 | 65.2 |
1266 | 478 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 20.0 |
1268 | 293 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 33.3 |
1272 | 1911 | 196 | 10 | 116 | 80 | 59.2 |
1274 | 1589 | 186 | 12 | 94 | 92 | 50.5 |
1280 | 396 | 39 | 10 | 25 | 14 | 64.1 |
1284 | 2290 | 153 | 7 | 86 | 67 | 56.2 |
1288 | 37 | 3 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 |
1290 | 2114 | 216 | 10 | 127 | 89 | 58.8 |
1292 | 67 | 9 | 13 | 5 | 4 | 55.6 |
1296 | 732 | 38 | 5 | 22 | 16 | 57.9 |
1324 | 1288 | 62 | 5 | 32 | 30 | 51.6 |
1326 | 553 | 77 | 14 | 45 | 32 | 58.4 |
1340 | 11 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 |
1352 | 2200 | 198 | 9 | 114 | 84 | 57.6 |
1360 | 883 | 94 | 11 | 47 | 46 | 50.5 |
1372 | 157 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 100.0 |
TOTAL | 40513 | 5239 | 13 | 3019 | 2216 | 57.7 |
Vote in the Group 5 Run-Off Election on Tuesday March 28th!
Congratulations! 14% of us turned out for our City Council Elections on March 14th. But we’re not done. There is a run-off election for Group 5 between Rachelle Litt and Joe Russo on Tuesday March 28th. One of these WILL be on the Council – so it’s up to you to vote again! I’ve linked to their profile answers above, and if you want to do more research – look at responses from our forum here: Candidate Forum Synopsis with Videos for each question.
The polls are open from 7am to 7pm on Tuesday March 28th. There will be no lines! Here are the polling locations. Here is your sample ballot.
You’re active residents – please encourage your family, neighbors and friends to vote too!
Here is a detailed analysis of the March 14th election results. Congratulations to Group 1 winner Mark Marciano and Group 3 winner Matthew Lane. And thanks to all the fine folks who gave of themselves to run for the Council.
We get the government we deserve – and it’s up to us to watch what they do.
An Analysis of the 2017 PBG Council Election
The March 14 municipal elections in Palm Beach Gardens yielded a pair of winners – Dr. Mark Marciano in Group 1 and Matthew Lane in Group 3. No candidate got a majority in the four way race in Group 5, so Rachelle Litt and Joe Russo will meet in a runoff on 3/28.
In Group 1, the seat currently held by Bert Premuroso, Dr. Marciano performed strongly in most areas of the city, winning by 33 points with 66% of the vote. A long time participant in city government, Mark served on the budget committee for quite a few years and is a regular at city council meetings. His challenger, Michael Paolercio, a newcomer to city politics came closest in Frenchman’s Reserve and Creek, where he lives.
In Group 2, the seat currently held by Eric Jablin, Matthew Lane avoided a runoff in the three way race by capturing 50.2% – a majority by 13 votes. Matthew, who entered the race over a year ago has also been a regular at council meetings and is active in many local civic organizations. Of his two challengers, Quicken Loans founder and past Senate candidate Ron Berman did well in the Gardens last fall, but was a newcomer to city issues and that may have come across. Challenger Katie Gettinger has been active in local issues and a regular at council meetings, but her lightly funded campaign did not do any direct mail or put up signs, possibly limiting her exposure to the voters.
In Group 5, the seat currently held by Mayor Marcie Tinsley, Pharmacist Rachelle Litt and tech enterpreneur Joe Russo won 37% and 34% of the vote respectively, advancing to the runoff election on 3/28. Of the others in this four way race, challenger Kevin Easton, who has run for Council several times before and was a principal in advancing term limits in the Gardens, polled 9% while retired Attorney George Wicker won 20%. Mr. Wicker did especially well in BallenIsles (where he lives), getting 51% of the vote there, 41% of his total vote count. Mr. Wicker also won Frenchman’s Reserve and Creek by 12 votes over Rachelle Litt.
Group 1
Group 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Strong Marciano | Weak Marciano | Very Close | Weak Paolercio | Strong Paolercio |
Click the precinct on the map for vote totals. |
Precinct | Registered | Votes Cast | Turnout % | Marciano | Paolercio | Marciano Margin |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1186 | 1428 | 238 | 17 | 167 | 66 | 71.7 |
1188 | 867 | 68 | 8 | 41 | 26 | 61.2 |
1189 | 73 | 15 | 21 | 3 | 12 | 20.0 |
1190 | 3158 | 346 | 11 | 225 | 111 | 67.0 |
1192 | 1474 | 187 | 13 | 134 | 51 | 72.4 |
1194 | 2024 | 620 | 31 | 316 | 296 | 51.6 |
1238 | 1668 | 348 | 21 | 218 | 124 | 63.7 |
1240 | 2483 | 404 | 16 | 289 | 106 | 73.2 |
1242 | 2488 | 531 | 21 | 378 | 121 | 75.8 |
1244 | 1539 | 254 | 17 | 175 | 70 | 71.4 |
1246 | 2377 | 305 | 13 | 166 | 132 | 55.7 |
1247 | 221 | 51 | 23 | 9 | 40 | 18.4 |
1248 | 1488 | 259 | 17 | 169 | 82 | 67.3 |
1250 | 61 | 14 | 23 | 6 | 7 | 46.2 |
1252 | 2349 | 1010 | 43 | 544 | 332 | 62.1 |
1254 | 454 | 66 | 15 | 51 | 11 | 82.3 |
1260 | 1320 | 186 | 14 | 127 | 54 | 70.2 |
1266 | 479 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 40.0 |
1268 | 294 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 63.6 |
1272 | 1912 | 256 | 13 | 171 | 77 | 69.0 |
1274 | 1590 | 237 | 15 | 159 | 58 | 73.3 |
1280 | 396 | 47 | 12 | 26 | 21 | 55.3 |
1284 | 2287 | 184 | 8 | 135 | 42 | 76.3 |
1288 | 37 | 3 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 |
1290 | 2114 | 258 | 12 | 196 | 58 | 77.2 |
1292 | 67 | 24 | 36 | 22 | 2 | 91.7 |
1296 | 733 | 45 | 6 | 25 | 19 | 56.8 |
1324 | 1287 | 82 | 6 | 55 | 26 | 67.9 |
1326 | 553 | 79 | 14 | 61 | 17 | 78.2 |
1340 | 11 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 100.0 | |
1352 | 2202 | 222 | 10 | 145 | 68 | 68.1 |
1360 | 882 | 116 | 13 | 71 | 41 | 63.4 |
1372 | 156 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 100.0 | |
TOTAL | 40492 | 6478 | 16 | 4101 | 2078 | 66.4 |
Group 3
Group 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Strong Lane | Weak Lane | Very Close | Weak Berman/Gettinger | Strong Berman/Gettinger> |
Click the precinct on the map for vote totals. |
Precinct | Registered | Votes Cast | Turnout % | Berman | Gettinger | Lane | Lane Margin |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1186 | 1428 | 238 | 17 | 58 | 25 | 149 | 64.2 |
1188 | 867 | 68 | 8 | 18 | 27 | 22 | 32.8 |
1189 | 73 | 15 | 21 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 8.3 |
1190 | 3158 | 346 | 11 | 100 | 85 | 146 | 44.1 |
1192 | 1474 | 187 | 13 | 39 | 35 | 107 | 59.1 |
1194 | 2024 | 620 | 31 | 181 | 50 | 341 | 59.6 |
1238 | 1668 | 348 | 21 | 95 | 33 | 207 | 61.8 |
1240 | 2483 | 404 | 16 | 125 | 49 | 221 | 55.9 |
1242 | 2488 | 531 | 21 | 130 | 75 | 303 | 59.6 |
1244 | 1539 | 254 | 17 | 62 | 38 | 135 | 57.4 |
1246 | 2377 | 305 | 13 | 79 | 119 | 102 | 34.0 |
1247 | 221 | 51 | 23 | 40 | 2 | 7 | 14.3 |
1248 | 1488 | 259 | 17 | 72 | 75 | 103 | 41.2 |
1250 | 61 | 14 | 23 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 64.3 |
1252 | 2349 | 1010 | 43 | 417 | 90 | 394 | 43.7 |
1254 | 454 | 66 | 15 | 11 | 2 | 48 | 78.7 |
1260 | 1320 | 186 | 14 | 49 | 41 | 88 | 49.4 |
1266 | 479 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 80.0 | |
1268 | 294 | 11 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 18.2 |
1272 | 1912 | 256 | 13 | 74 | 69 | 105 | 42.3 |
1274 | 1590 | 237 | 15 | 66 | 73 | 87 | 38.5 |
1280 | 396 | 47 | 12 | 13 | 12 | 20 | 44.4 |
1284 | 2287 | 184 | 8 | 51 | 36 | 87 | 50.0 |
1288 | 37 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 100.0 | ||
1290 | 2114 | 258 | 12 | 65 | 47 | 142 | 55.9 |
1292 | 67 | 24 | 36 | 4 | 6 | 9 | 47.4 |
1296 | 733 | 45 | 6 | 19 | 17 | 9 | 20.0 |
1324 | 1287 | 82 | 6 | 28 | 22 | 32 | 39.0 |
1326 | 553 | 79 | 14 | 16 | 17 | 43 | 56.6 |
1340 | 11 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 0.0 | ||
1352 | 2202 | 222 | 10 | 59 | 46 | 106 | 50.2 |
1360 | 882 | 116 | 13 | 29 | 35 | 50 | 43.9 |
1372 | 156 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 33.3 |
TOTAL | 40492 | 6478 | 16 | 1918 | 1139 | 3084 | 50.2 |
Group 5
Group 5 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Strong Litt | Weak Litt | Very Close | Weak Russo | Strong Russo> |
Click the precinct on the map for vote totals. |
Precinct | Registered | Votes Cast | Turnout % | Easton | Litt | Russo | Wicker | Litt/Russo Margin |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1186 | 1428 | 238 | 17 | 20 | 127 | 61 | 24 | 67.6 |
1188 | 867 | 68 | 8 | 13 | 22 | 23 | 10 | 48.9 |
1189 | 73 | 15 | 21 | 2 | 13 | 13.3 | ||
1190 | 3158 | 346 | 11 | 32 | 119 | 153 | 31 | 43.8 |
1192 | 1474 | 187 | 13 | 10 | 70 | 73 | 28 | 49.0 |
1194 | 2024 | 620 | 31 | 53 | 186 | 132 | 198 | 58.5 |
1238 | 1668 | 348 | 21 | 17 | 161 | 104 | 54 | 60.8 |
1240 | 2483 | 404 | 16 | 17 | 206 | 132 | 43 | 60.9 |
1242 | 2488 | 531 | 21 | 25 | 242 | 169 | 77 | 58.9 |
1244 | 1539 | 254 | 17 | 17 | 104 | 110 | 20 | 48.6 |
1246 | 2377 | 305 | 13 | 59 | 111 | 97 | 35 | 53.4 |
1247 | 221 | 51 | 23 | 3 | 40 | 8 | 7.0 | |
1248 | 1488 | 259 | 17 | 31 | 104 | 89 | 35 | 53.9 |
1250 | 61 | 14 | 23 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 75.0 |
1252 | 2349 | 1010 | 43 | 11 | 172 | 307 | 515 | 35.9 |
1254 | 454 | 66 | 15 | 4 | 30 | 21 | 10 | 58.8 |
1260 | 1320 | 186 | 14 | 42 | 69 | 58 | 16 | 54.3 |
1266 | 479 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | ||
1268 | 294 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0 |
1272 | 1912 | 256 | 13 | 72 | 76 | 84 | 22 | 47.5 |
1274 | 1590 | 237 | 15 | 37 | 71 | 110 | 15 | 39.2 |
1280 | 396 | 47 | 12 | 7 | 19 | 14 | 5 | 57.6 |
1284 | 2287 | 184 | 8 | 11 | 89 | 61 | 18 | 59.3 |
1288 | 37 | 3 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | ||
1290 | 2114 | 258 | 12 | 21 | 107 | 93 | 32 | 53.5 |
1292 | 67 | 24 | 36 | 5 | 15 | 1 | 25.0 | |
1296 | 733 | 45 | 6 | 12 | 21 | 9 | 3 | 70.0 |
1324 | 1287 | 82 | 6 | 10 | 19 | 44 | 8 | 30.2 |
1326 | 553 | 79 | 14 | 8 | 41 | 27 | 3 | 60.3 |
1340 | 11 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 0.0 | |||
1352 | 2202 | 222 | 10 | 25 | 88 | 86 | 21 | 50.6 |
1360 | 882 | 116 | 13 | 18 | 41 | 37 | 20 | 52.6 |
1372 | 156 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
TOTAL | 40492 | 6478 | 16 | 578 | 2315 | 2175 | 1263 | 51.6 |
Good turnout for PBG Election
Congratulations to the winner in Group 1, Dr. Mark Marciano, who dominated the race with 66% of the vote over challenger Michael Paolercio, and in Group 3 to Matthew Lane who topped 50% in a three way race by 13 votes to avoid a runoff. The Group 5 race moves to a runoff between Rachelle Litt and Joe Russo who captured 37% and 34% respectively in the 4 way race.
Election results last evening were somewhat sporadic, with the Supervisor’s website lagging some of the other reporting sites. Accurate vote counts were not available at pbcelections.org until this morning. At one point during the evening, the wrong candidates were reported in various places as having won or advancing to the runoff. For some reason, Palm Beach County still has difficulty with election results and we really haven’t shaken the “curse of the hanging chad.”
Turnout for the three races averaged about 6200 – about 14% of the registered voters. Although low by November election standards (72% of the Gardens voted for President), it was near the top of the range for a March election. The record was reached in 2014 when 7085 turned out for the Jablin /Peragine race. To find another that surpassed this year’s turnout you need to go back to 2005 when 6400 voted in the Jablin / Sartory contest.
The runoff election will be held on March 28. Historically, turnout drastically declines in runoffs. The last March runoff election in the Gardens was in 2004 when David Levy defeated Carl Sabatello in Group 4. Although 6552 voted in the original contest, only 3850 showed up for the runoff. Mr. Levy got 74% – 2864 votes, which was down from the 2909 he got in the first race. Mr. Sabatello’s votes declined from about 1340 in the first contest to about 1000, so turnout (or lack thereof) can have dramatic results. Mr. Russo and Ms. Litt will have to keep their supporters focused to prevail in two weeks.
There was another runoff in 2004, when 6 candidates competed coincident to the August primary election in Group 1. Three times the August vote turned out in November, giving Hal Valeche a narrow victory over Jodie Barnett. It was the presidential election of course that drove that turnout.
Here are the results as reported by the Supervisor of election:
You Passed Term Limits – Now Vote on March 14th!
Almost 80% of the Gardens’ voters in 2014 passed Term Limits. Over 16,000 of us voted for it. So now – it’s time to repeat that kind of voter turnout on Tuesday and select 3 new members for our City Council, rather than the abysmal turnout numbers, (3500-5000 voters) typical in our Municipal Elections. Our local government impacts all of us daily; think about safety, traffic, parks, taxes, ordinances, regulations, policies and practices.
We have good candidates – but they’re not identical in experience or outlook and you have more than enough information to make an informed decision. If you haven’t had an opportunity to meet the candidates or research them, then please check out our
- Candidate Profiles
- Candidate Forum Synopsis with Videos for each question
- Martino Minute – Educate Yourself, Pick Your Favorite and Vote on March 14th!
The polls are open from 7am to 7pm on Tuesday March 14th. There will be no lines! Here are polling locations. Here is your sample ballot.
You’re active residents – please encourage your family, neighbors and friends to vote too!
Is it Architecture or Art, Plus Council Goodbyes
This, the last full Council meeting for three of the members, began with heartfelt thanks and goodbyes from Council Member Premuroso, Vice Mayor Jablin and Mayor Tinsley during Items of Resident Interest. See Sarah Peter’s article here.
Comments from the Public also were related to their upcoming departure, with former Mayor Joe Russo, Tom Cairnes of the PGA Corridor, Joseph R Russo and Joanie Elias all thanking the departing council and recounting memories and accomplishments.
Resolution 30, 2017 sparked the most fireworks at a Council meeting in quite awhile. Mayor Tinsley had asked that the item be moved to immediately following 2nd reading and adoption of Ordinance 9, 2017 and its associated Resolution 20, 2017 which approved the Gardens Corporate Center PUD – with two eleven story office buildings and a three story garage for the NE corner of PGA Blvd and Alt A1A. The corporate center was approved 5:0 with pyramids (shown in the picture). The controversy arose over the applicant’s request to consider the two pyramids atop the office buildings as art, to meet the AIPP (Art in Public Places) requirement for the complex. The City requires that 1% of the cost of the $40 million project be alloted to AIPP. The cost of the two pyramids atop the buildings come out to almost $1 million, thus over twice the amount needed to meet the AIPP requirements. However staff disagreed strenuously that the pyramids were an intrinsic part of the buildings and in the approval of related waivers (eg height) and were NOT art. The disagreement began immediately with a request by the developer’s representative to postpone the Resolution 30, 2017 to the May City Council meeting. This would mean that an entirely new Council would be hearing the request, while the current Council – which had been involved with the project and just approved it, would have no say. After hearing arguments on both sides, Council Member Woods wanted to postpone to the May meeting, and Council Member Marino also wanted postponement as well. Vice Mayor Jablin made a motion to not postpone the discussion. The motion passed 3:2 with Marino and Woods voting nay.
Both the developer and staff then made their presentations. The developer made his case based on lack of functionality of the pyramids, that the Corporate Center’s site was not visible to the public while the pyramids would be seen by those driving in any direction, and that they were designed by an artist. Staff reiterated that the building approvals were obtained with the pyramids there, that one of the requirements of AIPP is that the artwork be unique (but the buildings are inspired by almost identical building pair in Miami where the pyramids were not counted as art), and that a 2007 ordinance specifically rejects architectural features as art. After much discussion, the Council voted 5:0 to reject the applicant’s request. Council Member Woods did offer compromise suggestions saying that perhaps the developer could do something art-related with the water wall. However staff was quick to point out that the water wall itself was not art and that an art element would have to be added. But that is for a future discussion with the new council.
All other Ordinances and Resolutions passed 5:0 with little discussion. Kathryn Gettinger made comments regarding Ordinances 7 and 8 2017 raising her concerns about the regulations with respect to wheel stops and parking on the grass. George Wicker, on the board at Ballenisles spoke in favor of Resolution 21, 2017 amending documents for the development.
There were no City Manager and City Attorney reports.
2017 PBG Council Candidate Forum Synopsis
On February 28, PBG Watch, along with the Palm Beach County Tea Party, the Republican Club of the Northern Palm Beaches, the Republican Club of the Palm Beaches, and the North County Democratic Club hosted a candidate forum for the City Council election.
Moderated by WJNO Radio Host Brian Mudd, 9 candidates for three seats answered questions on a variety of current issues. The questions were drawn from a list of 18 in-depth topics that were provided to the candidates before the event.
The candidates are:
Mark Marciano | Michael Paolercio | Ron Berman | Kathryn Gettinger | Matthew Lane |
Group 1 | Group 3 | |||
Kevin Easton | Rachelle Litt | Joe Russo | George Wicker | |
Group 5 |
A Word about the Video
The video of the event, recorded for youtube by PBG Watch, can be viewed in full HERE. The video icons in the table below are links into the full video that start at the question of interest. If you have trouble viewing any of it, you can click on the “youtube” link under the video frame and view it there using the index provided.
Present for the forum was current Councilpersons Maria Marino and Carl Woods, and Former Gardens Mayors Eric Jablin, David Levy, Joe Russo, Mike Martino, Linda Monroe, and Walter Wiley..
The meeting was kicked off by PBG Watch Co-founder Iris Scheibl, who introduced the leaders of the other sponsoring groups including Mel Grossman, President of Palm Beach County Tea Party, Mary Therese Delate, President of the North County Democratic Club, Marilyn Parmet, President of the Republican Club of the Northern Palm Beaches, Fran Hancock, President of the Republican Club of the Palm Beaches and Fred Scheibl, co-founder of PBG Watch who introduced moderator Brian Mudd. Timekeeping duties were performed by Barbara Grossman of the Palm Beach County Tea Party.
Below you will find a summary of the event, with the questions that were asked, and a link to a video of that section of the forum.
2017 PBGWatch Candidate Forum | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Welcome and Moderator Introduction | ||||
Opening Statements
|
||||
Round One | ||||
Question: Term Limits Council / Staff Relationship – With term limits, the governance experience of a Council member will be less than in the past, and some say that shifts the balance of power to the City Manager and staff. Sunshine laws also have an effect in that Council members can interact privately with staff but not with each other. Do you see this as a problem and how will you balance a good relationship with city staff against your duty to represent constituents?
Answered by Group 1: Mark Marciano and Michael Paolercio. | ||||
Question: Sales Tax Revenue – The sales tax will provide a 10 year revenue stream to Palm Beach Gardens totaling $35M, that could have gone to existing and forecast capital projects, reducing property taxes. Instead, the current Council opted to borrow $30M against it and spend it all in 3 years on projects that were created above and beyond the existing capital plan. Did you agree with this decision? Why or why not?
Answered by Group 3: Ron Berman, Katie Gettinger, Matthew Lane |
||||
Question: Annexation – The city has developed a long-term annexation plan for those pockets of unincorporated PBC enclaves within and around the city limits. Typically, the neighborhoods annexed gain a government but end up paying higher taxes. Some neighborhoods desire to be annexed and request it of the city. Others would rather not. How agressive should the city be in acquiring these pockets of independence, and is it beneficial to grow the city in this way?
Answered by Group 5: Kevin Easton, Rachelle Litt, Joe Russo and George Wicker. |
||||
Round Two | ||||
Question: Community Differences – Palm Beach Gardens consists of both high end, gated, golf course communities and older un-gated neighborhoods of more moderate housing. These neighborhood types have different lifestyles and different expectations from the City Government. Do you see this as a problem, and how would you balance the needs of disparate communities?
Answered by Group 1: Michael Paolercio and Mark Marciano. |
||||
Question Council Districts – With the growth of the city, and its spread out west with Avenir, there will be geographic differences within the city that some say would benefit by a district organization. Council positions would either be elected to represent a specific district by the voters who live there, or they would continue to be elected city-wide but be required to live in the district and represent it as is done in West Palm Beach. Do you favor such a change? Why / Why not?
Answered by Group 3: Matthew Lane, Katie Gettinger and Ron Berman. |
||||
Question Special Interests – The representatives of business or neighborhood groups, for example the PGA Corridor Association or the BallenIsles HOA, meet regularly with Council and staff and frequently speak in support of council actions at the monthly meetings. How will you weigh this input against the issues and positions that matter to the parts of the city that are less organized and vocal?
Answered by Group 5: George Wicker, Joe Russo, Rachelle Litt, Kevin Easton. |
||||
Wildcard Round | ||||
Question: Political Goals – Ultimately, in politics, what is your goal – what office would you like to achieve politically?
Answered by Group 1: Mark Marciano and Michael Paolercio. |
||||
Question: Transparency – Regardless of the popularity of an issue or position, what will you do in terms of transparency, will you promise to always be forthright, engage the community and be accountable to your constituents and the media?
Answered by Group 3: Ron Berman, Katie Gettinger and Matthew Lane. |
||||
Question: Catalyst – At what point and why did you decide to run for public office and what is it that you think you can move the needle on?
Answered by Group 5: Kevin Easton, Rachelle Litt, Joe Russo and George Wicker. |
||||
Round Three | ||||
Question: Road Projects – Traffic is a growing concern, particularly with continued development both within and around the city limits. The Beeline flyover, State route 7, the Hood Road I95 interchange and the widening of Northlake blvd, could help but they also have negative aspects. How forcefully should the city lobby the FDOT, either alone or through the Palm Beach MPO to affect if, how and when these road projects proceed?
Answered by Group 1: Michael Paolercio and Mark Marciano. |
||||
Question: Growth in Spending – With property valuations continuing to rise, there is less pressure on programs and tax rates. Assuming this continues, how can we prevent the explosion of spending that occurred during the last period of rising property values? With low expected inflation and modest population growth, how do you decide what is an acceptable level of spending growth?
Answered by Group 3: Matthew Lane, Katie Gettinger and Ron Berman. |
||||
Question: Inspector General Funding – The voters overwhelmingly approved the Inspector General and Ethics Ordinances and their application to municipal as well as county government. Many cities, including Palm Beach Gardens won on appeal the lawsuit challenging the right of the county to bill the cities for the cost of the IG Office. How much do you value independent IG oversight of Palm Beach Gardens, and how should these PBG specific services be compensated?
Answered by Group 5: George Wicker, Joe Russo, Rachelle Litt and Kevin Easton. |
||||
Closing Statements and Audience Questions | ||||
Closing Statements
|
||||
Audience Questions |